Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 43(6): 703-716, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36959127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Congenital lymphatic anomalies (LAs) arise due to defects in lymphatic development and often present in utero as pleural effusion, chylothorax, nuchal and soft tissue edema, ascites, or hydrops. Many LAs are caused by single nucleotide variants, which are not detected on routine prenatal testing. METHODS: Demographic data were compared between two subcohorts, those with clinically significant fetal edema (CSFE) and isolated fetal edema. A targeted variant analysis of LA genes was performed using American College of Medical Genetics criteria on whole exome sequencing (WES) data generated for 71 fetal edema cases who remained undiagnosed after standard workup. RESULTS: CSFE cases had poor outcomes, including preterm delivery, demise, and maternal preeclampsia. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were identified in 7% (5/71) of cases, including variants in RASopathy genes, RASA1, SOS1, PTPN11, and a novel PIEZO1 variant. Variants of uncertain significance (VOUS) were identified in 45% (32/71) of cases. In CSFEs, VOUS were found in CELSR1, EPHB4, TIE1, PIEZO1, ITGA9, RASopathy genes, SOS1, SOS2, and RAF1. CONCLUSIONS: WES identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants and VOUS in LA genes in 51% of fetal edema cases, supporting WES and expanded hydrops panels in cases of idiopathic fetal hydrops and fluid collections.


Subject(s)
Hydrops Fetalis , Lymphatic Abnormalities , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Female , Humans , Hydrops Fetalis/diagnosis , Hydrops Fetalis/genetics , Fetus/abnormalities , Lymphatic Abnormalities/genetics , Ion Channels , p120 GTPase Activating Protein
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 139(6): 1043-1049, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35675601

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between timing of administration of adjunctive azithromycin for prophylaxis at unscheduled cesarean delivery and maternal infection and neonatal morbidity. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis in patients with singleton gestations who were undergoing unscheduled cesarean delivery. The primary exposure was the timing of initiation of the study drug (after skin incision or 0-30 minutes, more than 30-60 minutes, or more than 60 minutes before skin incision). The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, and other maternal infections occurring up to 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included composite neonatal morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission for longer than 72 hours, and neonatal sepsis. The association of azithromycin with outcomes was compared within each antibiotic timing group and presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. A Breslow-Day homogeneity test was applied to assess differences in association by antibiotic timing. RESULTS: Of 2,013 participants, antibiotics were initiated after skin incision (median 3 minutes, range 0-229 minutes) in 269 (13.4%), 0-30 minutes before skin incision in 1,378 (68.5%), more than 30-60 minutes before skin incision in 270 (13.4%), and more than 60 minutes before skin incision (median 85 minutes, range 61-218 minutes) in 96 (4.8%). The RRs (95% CIs) of the infectious composite outcome for azithromycin compared with placebo were significantly lower for groups that initiated azithromycin after skin incision or within 1 hour before skin incision (after skin incision: RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.76; 0-30 minutes before: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.89; more than 30-60 minutes before: 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.66). Risks were not significantly different in patients who received azithromycin more than 60 minutes before skin incision (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.10-3.36). Results were similar when endometritis and wound infections were analyzed separately. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different for azithromycin compared with placebo across all timing groups. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive azithromycin administration up to 60 minutes before or at a median of 3 minutes after skin incision was associated with reduced risks of maternal composite postoperative infection in unscheduled cesarean deliveries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01235546.


Subject(s)
Azithromycin , Endometritis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Endometritis/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control
3.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(5): 539-545, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003227

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to evaluate the relationship between cesarean skin incision length and wound complications. STUDY DESIGN: Planned secondary analysis of a multicenter double-blind randomized trial of adjunctive azithromycin versus placebo (in addition to standard cefazolin) in women ≥24 weeks undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or ≥4 hours after membrane rupture. Skin incision length (cm) was measured just prior to skin closure. The primary outcome was a composite of wound complications (wound infection, separation, seroma, hematoma, or dehiscence) up to 6 weeks of postpartum. Individual components of the composite were examined as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups defined by the lowest (≤25th), middle (25-75th) and highest (>75th) incision length quartiles. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Of the 2,013 women enrolled in the primary trial, 1,916 had recorded incision lengths and were included in this secondary analysis. The overall rate of composite wound complications was 7.8%. Median incision length was 15.0 cm (interquartile range: 14.0-16.5) with the lowest quartile defined as ≤14, middle as >14 to ≤16.5, and highest as >16.5 cm. Mean BMI, parity, use of staples, and duration of surgery differed significantly between the three incision length groups. In unadjusted analysis, the longest incision lengths were associated with an increased risk of the wound composite and wound infections (odds ratio [OR] = 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-3.60 and OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.27-4.15, respectively) compared with the shortest incision lengths. However, after multivariable adjustments, these associations were nullified. Additional analyses considering incision length as a continuous variable and using 10th/90th percentile cut-offs still did not suggest any associations with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Increasing skin incision length is not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications. KEY POINTS: · After multivariable adjustments, skin incision length was not independently associated with an increased risk of postoperative wound complications.. · A reasonable incision length needed to safely perform the procedure should be used..


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications , Surgical Wound Infection , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/methods , Female , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Pregnancy , Seroma/epidemiology , Seroma/etiology , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Sutures/adverse effects
4.
N Engl J Med ; 375(13): 1231-41, 2016 09 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27682034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The addition of azithromycin to standard regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postoperative infection. We evaluated the benefits and safety of azithromycin-based extended-spectrum prophylaxis in women undergoing nonelective cesarean section. METHODS: In this trial conducted at 14 centers in the United States, we studied 2013 women who had a singleton pregnancy with a gestation of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture. We randomly assigned 1019 to receive 500 mg of intravenous azithromycin and 994 to receive placebo. All the women were also scheduled to receive standard antibiotic prophylaxis. The primary outcome was a composite of endometritis, wound infection, or other infection occurring within 6 weeks. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 62 women (6.1%) who received azithromycin and in 119 (12.0%) who received placebo (relative risk, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 0.68; P<0.001). There were significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in rates of endometritis (3.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02), wound infection (2.4% vs. 6.6%, P<0.001), and serious maternal adverse events (1.5% vs. 2.9%, P=0.03). There was no significant between-group difference in a secondary neonatal composite outcome that included neonatal death and serious neonatal complications (14.3% vs. 13.6%, P=0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibiotic prophylaxis, extended-spectrum prophylaxis with adjunctive azithromycin was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of postoperative infection. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; C/SOAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01235546 .).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Cesarean Section , Endometritis/prevention & control , Puerperal Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Azithromycin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/prevention & control , Survival Analysis , Young Adult
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 33(14): 1426-1432, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500932

ABSTRACT

Background The aim of this study was to determine whether racial/ethnic differences in psychosocial measures, independent of economic status, exist among a large population of pregnant nulliparas. Methods Between October 2010 and September 2013, nulliparous women at eight U.S. medical centers were followed longitudinally during pregnancy and completed validated instruments to quantify several psychosocial domains: Cohen Perceived Stress Scale, trait subscale of the Spielberger Anxiety Inventory, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Krieger Racism Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and the Pregnancy Experience Scale. Scores were stratified and compared by self-reported race, ethnicity, and income. Results Complete data were available for 8,128 of the 10,038 women enrolled in the study. For all measures, race and ethnicity were significantly associated (p < 0.001) with survey scores. Non-Hispanic black (NHB) women were most likely to score in the most unfavorable category for all measures, with the exception of the Pregnancy Experience Scale. The magnitude of these differences did not differ by income status (interaction, p > 0.05) except on the Krieger racism survey and the Edinburgh depression survey, which were exacerbated among NHB women with higher income (interaction, p < 0.001). Conclusion Significant racial/ethnic disparities, independent of income status, exist in psychosocial measures during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological/ethnology , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Self Report , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...